Hello Guys
There is a trick to validate with XHTML 1.0 Strict a page that use gSearch stack?
I tried to validate this page http://bit.ly/L0ETCW but return 18 errors..
Tanks
I change most of my pages to Transitional. If you are concerned about ranking in Google this is the first thing I would do for a quick fix. Until Rapidweaver adds a REAL validated output I would do this. My pages have been going backwards in google page ranking using 5. Only very simple pages that don't use a lot of plugins rank ok. Everything else is junk output. Ask a SEO professional to look at your output and they will want to redo EVERYTHING. The output is that bad. A few errors are ok, but I get 30-60 validation errors a page using stacks. This will pretty much kill your traffic my killing your rank. RealMac knows this and yet for years have not fixed this huge issue. My guess is they have this fixed it but are waiting for 6 to add it $$$. This only pisses off their customers even more!
A few errors are ok, but I get 30-60 validation errors a page using stacks.
I suggest you bring this to the attention of the developers whose stacks you are using as we don't control the output from any third-party plugins or addons (stacks). We're always looking to improve RW's output but any code from third-parties is beyond our control.
Thanks!
—Nik
Nik Fletcher, Product Manager, Realmac Software Twitter ~ Blog
Comments
I suggest you bring this to the attention of the developers whose stacks you are using as we don't control the output from any third-party plugins or addons (stacks). We're always looking to improve RW's output but any code from third-parties is beyond our control.
Thanks!
—Nik
Twitter ~ Blog