# Feature Request: Graphical Sitemap and Wireframe

**URL:** <https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/feature-request-graphical-sitemap-and-wireframe/43953>\
**Category:** RapidWeaver Elements\
**Created:** [July 28, 2024, 8:24pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/feature-request-graphical-sitemap-and-wireframe/43953 "2024-07-28T20:24:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jscotta](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/jscotta/32/26082_2.png) [@jscotta](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/jscotta)\
**Post date:** [July 28, 2024, 8:24pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/feature-request-graphical-sitemap-and-wireframe/43953/1 "2024-07-28T20:24:41Z")

</div>

I know that this is a later version ask but I want to get it on the board. Rather than talk about it, I’ll upload two screen shots:

 ![Screenshot 2024-07-28 at 3.21.05 PM](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/uploads/realmacsoftware1/original/3X/d/4/d4b67a80d35529873e8b7f97385bd0e1d0fc0431.png)

 ![Screenshot 2024-07-28 at 3.21.38 PM](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/uploads/realmacsoftware1/original/3X/0/1/01a45b181ec88c5445c8481743177bc3ba04572b.jpeg)

I find that these give me a great overview of my project. I can get a sense of flow and completeness that I can’t get by looking at a small bit of the site as is usual for Rapidweaver and Elements. Not bad mind you, this just adds to it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anon68150607](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/4bbf92/32.png) [@anon68150607](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/anon68150607)\
**Post date:** [July 28, 2024, 8:52pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/feature-request-graphical-sitemap-and-wireframe/43953/2 "2024-07-28T20:52:46Z")

</div>

Ooh, I really like this idea as I often struggle to get a whole sense of a project when I’m only interacting with it one page at a time. Sure, I could recreate all of it in a graphics editor, but that create a lot of additional work that must be continually updated to ensure it accurately reflect the site in it’s current state.

I can see this being combined with something like a preflight check that would ensure all resources and links are valid and accessible.