# Foundry or Foundation, what is more complete and future proof?

**URL:** <https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801>\
**Category:** RapidWeaver Classic\
**Created:** [February 27, 2021, 6:52am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801 "2021-02-27T06:52:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 17\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kunstmaler](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/kunstmaler/32/934_2.png) [@Kunstmaler](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/Kunstmaler)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2021, 10:49am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/42 "2021-04-28T10:49:33Z")

</div>

The loading time of your website is not as good as it should be.  
[https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?hl=de&url=https%3A%2F%2Fmonnee.in&tab=desktop](https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?hl=de&url=https%3A%2F%2Fmonnee.in&tab=desktop)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fmonnee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/b9bd4f/32.png) [@fmonnee](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/fmonnee)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2021, 10:52am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/43 "2021-04-28T10:52:17Z")

</div>

Thanks that is interesting! could this be because of the formloom stack or the in total 4 slider stacks, or maybe the size of the images? I keep learning! Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kunstmaler](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/kunstmaler/32/934_2.png) [@Kunstmaler](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/Kunstmaler)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2021, 10:52am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/44 "2021-04-28T10:52:33Z")

</div>

PageSpeed Insights: [PageSpeed Insights](https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?hl=de&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.talkgerman.biz&tab=mobile)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fmonnee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/b9bd4f/32.png) [@fmonnee](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/fmonnee)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2021, 11:04am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/45 "2021-04-28T11:04:16Z")

</div>

Thanks again! I have used png files, would jpg files be a better option?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pmjd](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/pmjd/32/18671_2.png) [@pmjd](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/pmjd)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2021, 11:34am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/46 "2021-04-28T11:34:43Z")

</div>

PNG files are only needed when you have a transparent background, otherwise JPG are better.

However, you need to do a lot of image optimisation work on your site, also look in to lazy loading options too.

Joe has a really good video about WebP (a newer and more efficient image format) and images in Foundation 6, well worth a watch [How to use WEBP images for Faster Websites - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6FVCFdZcio)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kunstmaler](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/kunstmaler/32/934_2.png) [@Kunstmaler](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/Kunstmaler)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2021, 11:53am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/47 "2021-04-28T11:53:36Z")

</div>

The file size for images should be as small as possible.  
jpg images are usually always better than png images.  
PNG only under certain circumstances, for example when a transparent area is desired.

Besides the file size, the image size is of course also important. Large images only if necessary.

Excuse my bad English, this is not my language.

@pmjd  
WebP Images?  
I’m not sure if this is supported by all browsers?  
jpg images can be downsampled well with the right tools without any loss of quality.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kunstmaler](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/kunstmaler/32/934_2.png) [@Kunstmaler](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/Kunstmaler)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2021, 11:58am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/48 "2021-04-28T11:58:28Z")

</div>

For downsampling jpg images I use the tool: [https://pichiapp.com](https://pichiapp.com)  
or [Optimage for Mac: Free Download + Review [Latest Version]](https://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/58733/optimage)

However, there are also numerous free online tools.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fmonnee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/b9bd4f/32.png) [@fmonnee](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/fmonnee)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2021, 12:25pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/49 "2021-04-28T12:25:34Z")

</div>

> [@pmjd](#):
>
> How to use WEBP images for Faster Websites - YouTube

Thanks! watching it now!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pmjd](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/pmjd/32/18671_2.png) [@pmjd](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/pmjd)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2021, 1:39pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/50 "2021-04-28T13:39:09Z")

</div>

WebP isn’t supported by older versions of Safari (I can attest to that on my iPhone 6 and 2011 MacBook Pro) but is well supported by almost all modern browsers.

So having a fallback option to png/jpg is a good option.

The video I linked to covers how to use WebP with a fallback in Foundation 6.  
There is [Shakingthehabituals’ Srcerer stack(s)](https://shakingthehabitual.com/stacks/srcerer/), which includes a WebP stack with 1X and 2X WebP support and 1X 2X fallback.  
WillWoodgate also has a free [WebPStack](https://stacks4stacks.com/webpstack/) that does the same.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MartWaring](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/martwaring/32/834_2.png) [@MartWaring](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/MartWaring)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2021, 5:09pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/51 "2021-04-28T17:09:01Z")

</div>

The live stream tutorials work quite well when accompanied by demo project files. The latest release of updates to the swatch pack shows exactly what each swatch does in a RW project so that you can see the workings. You don’t get that with a written document. I’ve started to keep my own demo project file going with multiple sections, whenever I find out how to build something interesting that I might use again. That way building a new site often just starts with a copy/paste job and a bit of tweaking. The other thing about the live stream is that it keeps things fresh and interesting as nearly every week there is something new to learn.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![joeworkman](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/joeworkman/32/23780_2.png) [@joeworkman](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/joeworkman)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2021, 8:27pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/52 "2021-04-28T20:27:52Z")

</div>

Since this thread has been re-opened, I should add that since this post was created, Foundation 6 has a completely new demo website that should serve as pretty good documentation since I also provide you with the RW project file used to generate the demos.

Home: [https://www.foundationstacks.com/](https://www.foundationstacks.com/)  
Demos: [Demo | Foundation 6 Stacks for RapidWeaver](https://www.foundationstacks.com/demo/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![artista](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/71c47a/32.png) [@artista](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/artista)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2021, 8:50pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/53 "2021-04-28T20:50:14Z")

</div>

Very nice Joe. Great Demo site.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fmonnee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/b9bd4f/32.png) [@fmonnee](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/fmonnee)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2021, 1:37pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/54 "2021-04-30T13:37:27Z")

</div>

Thanks Joe and I reading it.  
Today when changing all my image from jpg to jp2 & .webp I found out that when publishing my website the images are all converted into .png… Is this something in Foundation or Rapidweaver, I have added the image and retina boxes… regarding my website [https://monnee.in](https://monnee.in) Or do I need to save them at another place?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![joeworkman](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/joeworkman/32/23780_2.png) [@joeworkman](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/joeworkman)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2021, 3:18pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/55 "2021-04-30T15:18:26Z")

</div>

Did you watch my live stream on Webp? I talk about this exact topic

You may want to start a new thread about this since it’s not really related.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fmonnee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/b9bd4f/32.png) [@fmonnee](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/fmonnee)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2021, 3:22pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/56 "2021-04-30T15:22:44Z")

</div>

Thanks Joe, will do and watch you YouTube video again, would not be surprised I missed out a few things here

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![teefers](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/teefers/32/8173_2.png) [@teefers](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/teefers)\
**Post date:** [May 5, 2021, 3:23pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/57 "2021-05-05T15:23:40Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 5 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dan](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/dan/32/28516_2.png) [@dan](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/dan)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2026, 8:32pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801/58 "2026-08-12T20:32:47Z")

</div>



[Previous page](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/foundry-or-foundation-what-is-more-complete-and-future-proof/37801.md?page=2)
