# Publishing Question

**URL:** <https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/publishing-question/43114>\
**Category:** RapidWeaver Classic\
**Created:** [April 23, 2024, 11:42am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/publishing-question/43114 "2024-04-23T11:42:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pearson4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/5f8ce5/32.png) [@pearson4](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/pearson4)\
**Post date:** [April 23, 2024, 11:42am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/publishing-question/43114/1 "2024-04-23T11:42:46Z")

</div>

I’m wondering if it’s best to re-publish all files or just the the updated files.  
Sure it takes longer, but that’s not a real concern for me.

My thinking is, wouldn’t it possibly be better for SEO to have all pages with the same cache # or does it really matter at all ?

I’ve been working hard to get on the “Evil One’s” (Google) good side again and I’m getting happy with my work, just looking for that extra credit work…The last 2 Core updates have hit my ranking and I’ve lost an awful lot of visitors to [CustomDrains.com](https://customdrains.com) which drops me from having sufficient Core Web Vitals data

 ![PS-Home-42024](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/uploads/realmacsoftware1/original/3X/8/c/8c14fc2489db3ee260408235b8f06d8761e3e82e.png)