# RapidWeaver 9 Wishlist, what do you want to see?

**URL:** <https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/rapidweaver-9-wishlist-what-do-you-want-to-see/33526>\
**Category:** RapidWeaver Classic\
**Created:** [June 23, 2020, 2:46pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/rapidweaver-9-wishlist-what-do-you-want-to-see/33526 "2020-06-23T14:46:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 36

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Flash](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/f475e1/32.png) [@Flash](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/Flash)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2020, 12:25am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/rapidweaver-9-wishlist-what-do-you-want-to-see/33526/36 "2020-07-06T00:25:07Z")

</div>

> [@dan](#):
>
> Bigger things are coming, but the first big thing will be RW9 + Big Sur + Apple Silicon Support!

Just concerned as we have heard this before.

> [@Beautiful new Realmac blog](http://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/beautiful-new-realmac-blog/16245/47):
>
> Is there any point then to RW’s own blog feature, if even RW don’t use it? It’s not as if they haven’t had the option to develop the RW Blog function. I do find it says a lot about RW when they don’t use their own blogging feature in their own app when creating their own blog! If it’s not good enough they should have rectified it long ago, after all, they are the developers. It highlights a dead built in feature. Considering the majority of sites need or use a blog, it surprises me that RW does…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/rapidweaver-9-wishlist-what-do-you-want-to-see/33526)._
