# Thoughts on google fonts and GDPR

**URL:** <https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/thoughts-on-google-fonts-and-gdpr/21186>\
**Category:** RapidWeaver Classic\
**Created:** [July 27, 2018, 4:17pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/thoughts-on-google-fonts-and-gdpr/21186 "2018-07-27T16:17:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 12\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mysterion](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/mysterion/32/10689_2.png) [@Mysterion](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/Mysterion)\
**Post date:** [July 27, 2018, 4:17pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/thoughts-on-google-fonts-and-gdpr/21186/1 "2018-07-27T16:17:19Z")

</div>

The initial hysteria about GDPR has past, and I cleaned up my site pretty extensively. I got rid of google analytics and replaced it with Matomo (with GDPR friendly settings). I ditched Vimeo embeds due to the many cookies and tracking they do, and replaced them with self-hosted html5 video. I checked to verify that my site does not install cookies, and added a privacy page. I think my site is basically clean.

However, I am using a google font. Some are of the opinion that google fonts are taboo with GDPR, because even though no cookies are installed, google does have access to the IP address of the user. Others say it is a “grey area”. Frankly, I am kind of okay with “grey area”. Unless some countries are blocking their use or something?

Anyone care to share their thoughts about using google fonts in the GDPR era?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rovertek](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/rovertek/32/223_2.png) [@Rovertek](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/Rovertek)\
**Post date:** [July 28, 2018, 7:43pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/thoughts-on-google-fonts-and-gdpr/21186/2 "2018-07-28T19:43:22Z")

</div>

I don’t know about others, but I think you’ve done the right thing. Next thing I would do, I would make sure that my fonts are self-hosted ( **especially** in case of Google Fonts). Foundry lets you do that. ThemeFlood’s themes have dozens of fonts built-in, some other themes probably have similar abilities.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mysterion](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/mysterion/32/10689_2.png) [@Mysterion](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/Mysterion)\
**Post date:** [July 28, 2018, 9:19pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/thoughts-on-google-fonts-and-gdpr/21186/3 "2018-07-28T21:19:51Z")

</div>

Yes, I would prefer to self-host the google fonts, which I use for the header, navigation, and titles. I am using Foundation, which appears not have any built-in way to do that. If someone knows a free or inexpensive method to self-host fonts using Foundation, I’m listening!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![joeworkman](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/joeworkman/32/23780_2.png) [@joeworkman](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/joeworkman)\
**Post date:** [July 29, 2018, 1:10am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/thoughts-on-google-fonts-and-gdpr/21186/4 "2018-07-29T01:10:13Z")

</div>

You can type in a custom Font Family into Site Styles. But this means that you would be responsible for loading the font file your self. Its pretty simple…

[https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3\_pr\_font-face\_rule.asp](https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3_pr_font-face_rule.asp)

Font Pro can definitely help you with this as well… It’s a very powerful font loading and styling tool. [https://www.fontprostacks.com](https://www.fontprostacks.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fuellemann](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/fuellemann/32/22871_2.png) [@Fuellemann](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/Fuellemann)\
**Post date:** [July 29, 2018, 6:24am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/thoughts-on-google-fonts-and-gdpr/21186/5 "2018-07-29T06:24:24Z")

</div>

You can use the custom font stack from @instacks, it works very well for me:

> **[inStacks Software | CustomFont Stack - Use your own or custom fonts in...](https://instacks.com/customfontstack/)**
>
> The CustomFont Stack allows you to use your own or custom fonts in styled texts or HTML. Be different with choosing your own typography in RapidWeaver projects. Also supports typography.com and fonts.com web fonts.

It is free, so you can test it with Foundation.

Kind regards,  
Jan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![webdeer](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/webdeer/32/5299_2.png) [@webdeer](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/webdeer)\
**Post date:** [July 29, 2018, 9:52am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/thoughts-on-google-fonts-and-gdpr/21186/6 "2018-07-29T09:52:08Z")

</div>

The smart approach is to take control of anything served from a remote server such as Google fonts, if this is possible. It certainly is possible in RW+Stacks with the right stacks, but you have to jump through some hoops. Elixir gets full marks for putting in place an easy to implement way to load Google Fonts by May 25 in Foundry. As Fuellemann pointed out, you can use the free inStacks CustomFont stack to load Google Fonts in Foundation. (This is exactly how I loaded local GF in my Foundation version of [Project15](https://webdeersign.com/pr15demo2/simplecookies/)).

Once you do load them locally, you have the freedom to use any web font you like and not just be restricted to Google Fonts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mysterion](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/mysterion/32/10689_2.png) [@Mysterion](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/Mysterion)\
**Post date:** [July 29, 2018, 2:21pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/thoughts-on-google-fonts-and-gdpr/21186/7 "2018-07-29T14:21:30Z")

</div>

Many thanks Joe, Jan, and Gary for your suggestions. Joe’s Font Pro would do the trick nicely, but it is kind of overkill for what I need and pricey. The “font face rule” looks like it could work, but is a workaround, so not sure if that is the right solution. The Custom Font stack looks promising, and free at that! I really like Foundation, but it seems to me that Foundation should have an easy built-in way to implement warehoused fonts. Especially since the competition, Foundry, has responded to GDPR needs and has that option as a feature. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tav](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/tav/32/5458_2.png) [@tav](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/tav)\
**Post date:** [July 29, 2018, 4:02pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/thoughts-on-google-fonts-and-gdpr/21186/8 "2018-07-29T16:02:05Z")

</div>

Foundation was actually the **first** RW platform to fully support self hosted fonts and professional typography via the [Font Styles](http://demo.bigwhiteduck.com/fontstyles/) stack 3 years ago .

At the time, virtually no on was interested in it as they just wanted the simple Google CDN approach, despite Google Fonts at the time being pretty substandard for the most part. Since then, Google Fonts have greatly improved in quality.

I withdrew Font Styles in response to the lack of general interest and that the specialist interest could then be served by the new Font Pro.

Regarding your original question, then in reality the jury is still out as it were. There is no definitive judgement on whether Google Fonts violate GDPR. Countless links have been posted on the GDPR subject pointing to various pages, none of which are actual case law or court findings.

I don’t propose that we open the GDPR debate again but suffice to say several of my sites still use Google Fonts and will do so as a matter of principle until there is actual legal evidence that indicates to the contrary. I don’t particularly like Google but I like profiteering scaremongering solicitors even less.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mysterion](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/mysterion/32/10689_2.png) [@Mysterion](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/Mysterion)\
**Post date:** [July 29, 2018, 4:37pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/thoughts-on-google-fonts-and-gdpr/21186/9 "2018-07-29T16:37:30Z")

</div>

Andrew, I appreciate your take on the google fonts GDPR issue, and agree that there is no definitive judgement on the matter. Still, I like the idea of self-hosting custom fonts, especially if it can be done with relative ease. Interesting that you came up with the Font Styles stack, which was the origin of Font Pro. You were ahead of your time!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bazza](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/bazza/32/2104_2.png) [@Bazza](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/Bazza)\
**Post date:** [July 29, 2018, 5:03pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/thoughts-on-google-fonts-and-gdpr/21186/10 "2018-07-29T17:03:23Z")

</div>

Hi Andrew,

Might there be any chance that this stack could be reintroduced?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tav](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/tav/32/5458_2.png) [@tav](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/tav)\
**Post date:** [July 29, 2018, 10:04pm UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/thoughts-on-google-fonts-and-gdpr/21186/11 "2018-07-29T22:04:44Z")

</div>

I’m afraid not, I try hard to make new and unique stacks that do not compete with paid stacks on which people make their living.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/forums.realmacsoftware.com/system/32/25301_2.png) [@system](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [August 29, 2018, 8:04am UTC](https://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/thoughts-on-google-fonts-and-gdpr/21186/12 "2018-08-29T08:04:46Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
