I cannot imagine building a site without using warehoused images unless I wanted to:
- Enlarge the size of my RW file and slow down loading, saving and Publish times
- Slow down the loading of sites with duplicate images or icons by not taking advantage of browser caching
- Lose track of the name of images loaded into RW
- Prohibit me from using minuscule sized razor sharp SVG images
- Prohibit me from live editing multiple SVG images using only a text editor
- Making quick backups of all images used in a site
- Edit multiple similar images in RW or live by making one change
- Make quick changes in published sites (preview or edit also) by swapping out one image and not needing to Preview again.
- Speed up development and prototyping time.
- Improve SEO by naming images
The list goes on and on. If none of that is interesting, then avoid warehousing.
In about 18 months of using warehoused images with RW I have never found a draw back or problem and all you need is an FTP program and can even use the free CyberDuck FTP App. Further, I avoid any stack that doesn’t support warehousing.