So if you have a page with 30 images and you remove an image in the center do the remaining images automatically realign?
And if all the horizontal and vertical images on a page have the same longest dimension, do the vertical thumbs always have to appear larger? (masonry)
“If” I’m ever able to release addons, I’d price my pro gallery at circa £20, with a view to sell 1000 copies in time. 20 grand is good enough for me for a weeks work.
Can you animate a gallery collection? I noticed that there are animations for single images as you roll over them as I was wondering if that was the case for image groups?
@dan Thanks, instant purchase. Two questions:
a) Can we get rid of all the icons and options in the lightbox, so only the arrows or dots remain?
b) Can the Lightbox be disabled, so we only have a fantastic way to present images?
Thanks again,
Jan
I love the look of photo gallery pro but that would cost more than I paid for elements…
How do are the sub galleries configured? I cannot seem to find the setting for this.
Just drop in a folder of folders and it’ll automatically work.
All sub folders become their own gallery 
You can turn on/off almost everything, check the settings in the Lightbox group.
That’s not a feature we currently support in Gallery Pro! The main purpose of this component is to display galleries
Not currently, but that might be a nice addition for a future update 
@ben I do understand - but is there an option not to show the lightbox on mobile? The reason is that very often the image - as it is - is already as large as the lightbox will be able to display it. So there is no benefit in enlarging it but it rather distracts the user experience.
Further to my previous post about the new gallery pro and not displaying the lightbox here is a link, using all default settings that simply does not show the lightbox?
I think if you add another core component to the page, such as a Container, Flex, or Navigation it’ll start working.
I’ll see if I can get that fixed up, but adding another core component should see the gallery work as expected
That’s all it needed! Thanks Ben
You’ve captured exactly how I feel. I expressed similar but second guessed myself and deleted my post, feeling it was unfair to criticise after how much work has clearly gone into Elements and the passion behind Realmac, which I respect. I’m so grateful for Rapidweaver which I’ve used for 10+ years. I haven’t yet bought Elements but this has put me off - there’s literally a video comparing Elements to Stacks on YouTube, saying it’s an all in one solution, and you don’t need to keep shedding out money apart from the annual fee for updates. Now, in addition to an annual fee, if we want this component, we have to pay a substantial amount (almost as much as the annual fee). If this was available for £20 or £30, I’d perhaps feel more open to it if it’s a premium solution but the fee seems extortionate vs. what we’ve come to expect in Stacks. I guess I’m just here scratching my head after feeling excited for moving to Elements. I understand I just don’t need to buy this component if I don’t want it, but it feels risky investing in a system where these are the sorts of price points that are present.
@Fuellemann, I’d actually like this as an option too 
It would make for a super-quick way to put a masonry image layout on the page. I’ll have a chat with @ben and see if I can twist his arm in agreement 
Edit: Just chatting to @ben and he suggested that a pure Masonry image layout is a separate component… perhaps something simple we can build into Elements 
Does Gallery Pro not support WEBP?
It shows inside Elements, but not in preview or after being uploaded to the web server.
This is positive to hear.
@ham-uk It’s worth noting that Elements already includes a powerful built-in Gallery component that’s suitable for the vast majority of sites and projects. The Pro Gallery add-on is designed more for professional photographers and designers who need advanced presentation options, so it’s intentionally a specialist tool rather than something everyone needs to purchase.
Here’s a video of the free built-in Gallery, and a link to the Docs. This is incldued with Elements and is excellent.
With Elements Plus at $149 (yours to keep forever), you get everything required to build modern websites out of the box. In many cases, achieving a similar setup in the Stacks ecosystem would involve purchasing many, many add-ons that would easily cost in access of $500.
If you’re unsure, the best approach is to try Elements for free and see how it fits your workflow. You may find the included tools already cover everything you need, and then you can decide later whether any specialised add-ons make sense for your projects.
Appreciate you taking the time to share feedback!
What would be the harm to have the option in the pro version (for the premium price)? If we have a normal component and then decide to have a light box or gallery we just have additional work. By having the option inside the ProGallery we have a better choice and support more use cases 
Yup, agreed. Let me see what we can do!
