Kuler SQL pagination in base stack?

jnorris235 http://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/jnorris235 Jon Norris http://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/jnorris235
October 3
Many thanks. Will await 1.6.8 of the ProTable stack.
The responsive feature wasn’t there last week!
End of thread, then.
Bad news for you - I bought the CRUD stack…
Thank you once more!

Jon Norris

Herefordshire’s favourite Childrens Entertainer - WizardWonky.co.uk http://wizardwonky.co.uk/ ** Book Me Now!

Visit Topic http://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/kuler-sql-pagination-in-base-stack/9433/100 or reply to this email to respond.

In Reply To

Gary http://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/gary Addon Developer
October 3
Hi @jnorris235 http://forums.realmacsoftware.com/u/jnorris235 - The responsive feature isn’t new, it has been there for a few years and have not received a complaint on it to date (except for you). However since you are in a bind, I will see if I can add an option to remove the responsive nature of the table and push that out today. Also, for…
Visit Topic http://forums.realmacsoftware.com/t/kuler-sql-pagination-in-base-stack/9433/100 or reply to this email to respond.

To unsubscribe from these emails, click here http://forums.realmacsoftware.com/email/unsubscribe/13d42b14904fa28689aae5456f8596199bf5b899712c89165fb3e75b48919165.

LOL … Yeas the responsive feature has been there since late 2014 and since the very beginning of the PRO Table (the PROTable has never not had it).
Also, I already pushed out the 1.6.8 version earlier this morning. You should check for updates via Stacks to get it. Let me know if it gets you going.
Gary

All done, thank you, brilliant job

@jnorris235- I know that people must be getting tired of being alerted every time you and I interact on this forum. PLEASE consider using my email address to send communication.
gary@kuler.solutions

1 Like

Although, to be fair, it is an object example in patient support for your clients! I salute you, Monsieur Kuler. Your Kuler stacks have always worked brilliantly for me, and I look forward to trying CRUD as soon as I can think of a clever use for it.

4 Likes

Actually I am quite interested. I would buy anything from Gary right now, if I could use it :slight_smile:

1 Like

End result. Huge thank you to @Gary for his amazing patience. Unfortunately he couldn’t replicate my problem. My fields were longer than his example and overflowed the table cells. Either the text formatted and the pagination failed or vice versa.

To avoid text either overflowing or simply being cut off I added this css into a css box (Joe Workman) in a partial so it was included on all 80 pages. Gary has all his cells as “nowrap” - and weirdly the way to stop this was to add white-space. And the pagination stayed working. No credit due to me, I just fiddled til it worked!
td.column_1 {
white-space: normal !important;
}
And the !important was vital.

Secondly. His CRUD stack worked perfectly, whereas the proTable stack seemed not to for me. I used the CRUD stack as a client search facility by hiding the Add and Edit buttons with this css. I still have the table cell widths to solve (20 odd fields to cram in and unable to layout yet).

.simplecrud-current  {
visibility:hidden;
}

a[data-task=“create”] {
visibility:hidden;
}

a[data-task=“csv”] {
visibility:hidden;
}

Also with the Search usage of the CRUD stack the column widths are only the width of the column heading - whereas the data would just word-wrap underneath it giving a deep column of half words making it unreadable.
Fixed with, on the actual page:
.simplecrud-row {
white-space: nowrap;
}

Pretty good stacks!!! One thing I did learn, but don’t understand, is keep republishing. Sometimes it works OK sometimes not.

1 Like