again I found out that an older stack (that I was extensively using) is dropped in its development and it is not working anymore properly.
Is there an automated way to have a list of all the stacks used in a project? Maybe even pointing at the pages where it is used in order to be fast in evolving the project to full function again?
No there isnāt. The best way is to make it a part of your workflow and use Rapidweaverās Notes feature to keep a record of the stacks being used. Not great I know, but thatās the only way I know of.
If you look at the source code in RW or use the browser developer panel on the live site to look at the source code, you might find all the stacks listed in the code close to the top of the code.
If the page you supply has the stacks metadata available then you should get a reasonable report based on that data. Other info might be supplied too depending on what can be mined out of the page data.
It is super basic and was really just put together as a proof of concept. It would be much better if Stacks had some sort of reporting option.
Give this a shotā¦ I made it during one of my Friday Hangouts a while agoā¦
Itās a Finder Quick Action. Once you install it, right click on a folder that contains a RapidWeaver export. It will generate a stacks.txt file that will contain the names of every stack used in the project.
You have to look in the export folder. It puts there a document called āstack.txtā there You have the list of the stacks used in the project.
Wellā¦ the top would be to have the list of stacks used per page. But this, is already a great way to simplify the work and the complete check of the site.
Yes, thatās another way Iāve learnt from the solution suggested in this thread.
The one of @joeworkman is the simplest one and the one tailored for the lazy ones among us
I found the stacks.txt file in my Macās āHomeā folder. It takes some time, and after a while got my fans kicking in.
However I got identical results from two different local exports which are both Foundry sites. Unfortunately the results were not accurate at all - none of the stacks listed were in my projects, with the exception of āParagraphā and āHeaderā, which are kind of generic names. All the other stacks that were used in the projects were not listed at all.
Hereās the report I got for both sites:
1 Column Foundation
Font Styles
Grummage Proportional 1 Column Foundation
Header
Paragraph
Site Styles
Top Bar
One caveat is that this will not work if you have Stacks Meta tags turned off in the Stacks preferences. Here are the settings that I recommend that you useā¦